Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
The Late and Erroneous Filing Penalty (LEFP) Framework was implemented in 2002. OSFI requires all federally regulated financial institutions (FRFIs)Footnote 1 to file a variety of financial and corporate information required by statute or that OSFI deems necessary to carry out its legislative mandate. Much of this information is required in accordance with a pre-determined schedule and is subjected to review for accuracy and completeness when received. FRFIs are expected to have appropriate policies and procedures in place to ensure that all regulatory returns are received by OSFI within specified timeframes and are error free.
This guide is intended to provide an overview of the LEFP Framework in order to assist FRFIs with their responsibilities for providing timely and accurate information to OSFI.
The LEFP framework is solely designed to encourage FRFIs to file accurate information with OSFI on a timely basis. While the Framework incorporates a system of monetary penalties, it does not generate any revenues for OSFI. All funds collected under the Framework are applied to the Consolidated Revenue Fund (i.e., the Receiver General for Canada) and are not available to reduce the amounts assessed to the industry in respect of covering OSFI's operating costs.
The LEFP Framework operates under the guiding principles of simplicity, transparency, consistency and fairness. However, the variety and complexity of OSFI's filing requirements requires flexibility in adhering to these principles.
Simplicity in structure and administration of the Framework is essential to its effectiveness for both FRFIs and OSFI. The principle of transparency speaks to the extent to which the details of the Framework are communicated with and understood by all stakeholders. The Framework has been designed as much as possible to have a consistent impact, both within and across sectors. The Framework also attempts to recognize the interplay between accuracy and timeliness of information. Fairness is an element in both the structure and application of the Framework.
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act (the Act) and the
Administrative Monetary Penalties (OSFI) Regulations (the Regulations), the Superintendent has authority to impose penalties against financial institutions or natural persons in respect of the violations set forth in the Regulations. Section 5 of the Regulations sets out the levels of penalty (based on assets and explained below) as well as the legislative provisions to which the penalties apply (set out in more detail in the Schedule to the Regulations).
The LEFP Framework applies to most of the regulatory returns required by OSFI. The Appendix lists the returnsFootnote 2 subject to the Framework and the related due dates. In general, information that is collected by OSFI in standardized form and/or content and in accordance with a defined schedule or subject to the occurrence of a specific event (i.e., information that is collected via returns) is subject to the Framework.
FRFIs in "run off" continue to be responsible for all filings and returns until such time as they cease to be FRFIs (e.g. until the issuance of Letters Patent of Dissolution or, in the case of a foreign branch, until the revocation of its order to commence and carry on business or its order to insure in Canada risks). Returns required by the Superintendent may be waived by the FRFI's Relationship Manager or other responsible authority within OSFI. However, OSFI does not have authority to waive returns required by statute. FRFIs should therefore ensure that all regulatory returns, as listed in the Appendix, continue to be filed unless notified to the contrary.
The LEFP Framework applies only to regulatory returns required by OSFI and not to those Filings required by other federal agencies, such as the Bank of Canada and Statistics Canada.
A late return attracts a penalty at the prescribed
per diem rate. The table below outlines the penalty structure as established in section 5 of the Regulations, which is designed to establish penalties that act as a meaningful deterrent but that also recognize the significant differences in the size of FRFIs. As such, the penalties that may be levied are tiered according to a FRFI's total assets. The penalties are
per diem charges that are assessed in respect of
individual returns that are not received by OSFI in an error free state by the applicable due date.
It is important to note that the Superintendent
does not have authority to reduce or increase the amount of a
per diem penalty set under the LEFP Framework, because the
per diem rates, as set out in the table above, are prescribed by the Regulations.
The Regulations specify that $25,000 is the maximum penalty that may be imposed against a FRFI in respect of a specific violation.
A return or filing that is subject to the LEFP Framework must be:
As such, where a FRFI does not meet all of the above criteria in regard to any particular return or filing, it may be subject to a per diem penalty for each day beyond the required due date.
The due dates for some returns are prescribed by statute, while others are prescribed in various reporting manuals and memoranda. In most cases, a due date is defined in terms of a specified number of days following a given date, such as the last day of a fiscal or calendar quarter, or a specified number of days after the occurrence of a specific event. The Appendix summarizes the prescribed due dates for each return that is subject to the LEFP Framework. Where there is any doubt, however, the relevant statute (as applicable), filing instruction, reporting manual, or OSFI memorandum is the final authority.
In general, the prescribed due date is the date used for determining whether a return is late. As such, the Framework does not provide for a grace period. For example, an error-free return that is received before the end of the first day following the due date is considered one day late.
The following guidelines apply for the purpose of calculating the number of days a return is late:
FRFIs are requested to review OSFI Guideline E‑13
Legislative Compliance Management for an outline of OSFI's compliance management expectations.
Most financial returns are subjected to a variety of validation rules when they are received by OSFI. Most of OSFI's validation rules are mathematical rules that test the data for internal consistency, with very narrow tolerance levels.
The validation process may identify errors in a single return, or in two or more returns, and these errors would result in Violations in respect of each affected return. However, these errors should be avoidable because they are the result of a failure to comply with the validation rules. In addition, every FRFI has the ability to apply OSFI's validation rules against the information reported in its financial returns to identify such errors. OSFI posts all the validation rules in the process of validating data in financial returns on the RRS website.
OSFI acknowledges that its validation process cannot identify all errors and does not want to discourage FRFIs from correcting errors that the validation process does not detect. A FRFI may file corrections to previously submitted returns (that had passed validation rules) without penalty;
A revision containing an error (i.e. fails a validation rule) continues to attract a
per diem penalty at the prescribed rate until such time as OSFI receives an error-free corrected return;
Given that the
per diem amount of each penalty is prescribed in the Regulations, OSFI has no authority to waive or reduce the
per diem amount of a penalty once it has been incurred. OSFI may exercise discretion as to whether a penalty should be imposed. However, OSFI exercises this discretion judiciously so as not to undermine the integrity of the Framework. As such, few penalties are dealt with in this mannerFootnote 5. Please refer to the "Administrative review process" outlined below for further information.
Because of the important role these returns play in OSFI's supervisory and regulatory responsibilities, OSFI normally follows up, where possibleFootnote 6, with FRFIs to ensure that we collect the correct information we are legally obliged to receive and process. However, OSFI does not guarantee that a reminder will be issued for all or for any particular return or filing.
FRFIs have sole responsibility for ensuring that returns reach OSFI on time and error free. Further, OSFI has not committed to issue reminders within any specified time period. A decision to impose a penalty will be unrelated to whether OSFI issued a reminder, as it is the FRFI's responsibility to file on time and error free.
Where a FRFI has sent an error free return or filing that would otherwise meet the due date, but does not meet it due to an issue with OSFI's ability to record it as "received," or where OSFI makes an error that affects the correct recording of the filing date, any penalty that the LEFP system would automatically assess will either
not be imposed (i.e., a Notice of Violation will not be issued), or
corrected accordingly if a Notice of Violation was issued in error.
OSFI will provide each FRFI that files returns late (in a particular calendar quarter) with a Notice of Violation setting out late returns recorded in that quarter. Notices of Violation are issued and mailed on or about the middle of the month following each calendar quarter, and are addressed to the Chief Compliance Officer. Note that Notices of Violation only list returns that were received by OSFI during the period and
do not list returns that were due and not received during such period.
A Notice of Decision and invoice are issued 40 days after the date on the applicable Notice of Violation, unless a FRFI has requested an administrative review of the penalty. When the administrative review is complete, a Notice of Decision will be issued, and subsequently an invoice will be issued if the review concludes that imposing the penalty, or some portion thereof, proposed in the Notice of Violation is appropriate. (Please refer to "Administrative review process" below for further information).
For additional information or explanation, please contact the Regulatory Data Management Division at (613) 991-0609.
A FRFI that has a
compelling reason(s) for objecting to a penalty (penalties) set forth in a Notice of Violation may make representations to OSFI. A "compelling" reason for making representations is something over which the FRFI had little or no control. Examples could include a major systems failure, a major power outage, an emergency office closure, or a similar situation or business interruption that prevented the FRFI from producing or delivering the return to OSFI on time and error free. (Examples of situations that will
not be considered compelling by OSFI include: breakdowns in internal controls, staff shortages and vacations; the FRFI's previous good filing record/first time offence; and similar situations within the control of the FRFI.)
Representations must be made in writing and must be received by OSFI
no later than 35 days after the date of the Notice of Violation. Requests must be addressed to:
Attn: Senior Director
Legislation and Approvals Division
255 Albert Street, 15th floor
Ottawa, ON K1A 0H2
The request must clearly articulate why the review is being requested and the facts OSFI should take into consideration as part of its review. The letter must be signed by an appropriate senior officer of the FRFI, such as: the Chief Compliance Officer, the Corporate Secretary, the Chief Accountant (DTIs), the Chief Financial Officer (Insurers), or the Chief Agent or Principal Officer (branches of foreign companies and authorized foreign banks, respectively).
Representations received after the above deadline will normally not be considered.
After receiving representations from the FRFI, OSFI will review the representations and consult with the Relationship Manager of the FRFI and any other appropriate stakeholders. OSFI will normally issue a Notice of Decision to the FRFI within 30 days of receiving the representations. The Notice of Decision will indicate either that 1) the proposed penalty is withdrawn, 2) the penalty is reduced, or 3) the original penalty is upheld. In the latter two cases, an invoice will be issued to the FRFI.
Neither the timing nor content of OSFI's disclosure of financial regulatory information, pursuant to the various financial institutions statutes, influences the operation of the LEFP Framework, or vice versa.
Canadian Life & Fraternal (Q4) Annual
Canadian Life & Fraternal (Q1-Q3) Quarterly
Foreign Life & Fraternal (Q4) Annual
Foreign Life & Fraternal (Q1-Q3) Quarterly
90 for Reinsurance Co's
Canadian P&C (Q4) Annual
Canadian P&C (Q1-Q3) Quarterly
Foreign P&C (Q4) Annual
Foreign P&C (Q1-Q3) Quarterly
Canadian MI (Q4) Annual
Canadian MI (Q1-Q3) Quarterly
This list applies to Canadian and foreign entities, including banks, trust and loan companies, life insurance companies, property and casualty insurance companies, fraternal benefit societies and co-operative credit associations, including retail associations, as applicable.
For Filing Instructions applicable to Corporate Returns, please
refer to OSFI's website.
The LEFP Framework applies to all FRFIs, including banks, federally-regulated trust and loan companies, life insurance companies, fraternal benefit societies, property and casualty insurance companies, co-operative credit associations, cooperative retail associations and all authorized foreign banks, foreign insurance companies and foreign fraternal benefit societies operating in Canada. Federally regulated pension plans are not currently subject to the Framework.
Return to footnote 1
References in this Guide to "returns" include regulatory returns and related documents.
Return to footnote 2
As at December 31 of the preceding year.
Return to footnote 3
Pursuant to section 35 of the OSFI Act - Per violation, for each day the violation continues.
Return to footnote 4
For purposes of administrative efficiency, a penalty will usually not be imposed for a violation if the total amount of the penalty would be less than $250.
Return to footnote 5
As an example, OSFI cannot issue reminders in the case of some returns such as a change in corporate information, which is not based on the occurrence of a recurring or periodic event.
Return to footnote 6