Consultation: Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP) Discussion Paper

Information
Publication type
Consultation
Category
Capital Adequacy Requirements
Date
Sector
Banks,
Trust and Loan Companies
Table of contents

Consultation status: Open

The ILAAP discussion paper aims to start a conversation and share ideas and opinions on strengthening the supervisory review process (Pillar 2 liquidity) in Canada by examining the role of a potential ILAAP in Canada’s regulatory framework.

Please provide your feedback to Consultations@osfi-bsif.gc.ca by August 22, 2025.

In our Annual Risk Outlook, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) has identified funding and liquidity as one of the top risks for 2025-2026. Heightened geopolitical risk, uncertain financial markets, rapid cash outflows through digitization, and a changing and evolving risk environment are contributing factors.

Canada’s liquidity regime is strong, and we want to further enhance it by fostering a dialogue on liquidity adequacy with institutions and other stakeholders.

This discussion paper explores key Pillar 2 liquidity risks such as:

  • intraday liquidity risk
  • pledging risk and adequacy of unencumbered assets
  • foreign currency liquidity risk
  • solo and intragroup liquidity risk
  • franchise viability risk
  • short-term liquidity risk
  • product liquidity risk

The discussion paper also seeks views on proportionality (bank’s size, risk profile and complexity) in implementing an ILAAP, including reporting requirements.

Why it’s important 

As prudential supervisors, OSFI works to protect the rights and interests of depositors and other creditors while respecting federally regulated financial institutions’ need to compete and take reasonable risks. Institutions require strong internal liquidity management to navigate emerging risks and maintain stability in times of stress as financial markets continue to evolve. Liquid asset shortfalls causing an inability to meet short-term financial obligations would pose a significant risk and can undermine an institution’s ability to survive a stress event.

This consultation will help refine our approach to Pillar 2 liquidity supervision, so it meets international best practices while reflecting the financial sector in Canada.

Way forward

Perspectives and opinions from institutions and other stakeholders during this consultation will help determine the potential need for guidance relating to Pillar 2 risks.

Please provide your feedback to Consultations@osfi-bsif.gc.ca by August 22, 2025.

Contact us

For more information or for help submitting your feedback, please contact Consultations@osfi-bsif.gc.ca.